One of the original tools in the Left’s toolbelt, censorship remains a key feature in elitists' plan to continue their domination over the culture existent today, with deeper insight suggesting rampant attempts of “canceling” strong-willed right-wingers such as Donald Trump or Ben Shapiro. However, the recent rise of quasi-Conservative figures has facilitated the fabrication of a new method (one which rings similar to reverse psychology) being used by Big Tech gurus to further demonize genuine Conservatives.
Currently, Andrew Tate is possibly the most well known “right-wing loon” in politics. Needless to mention, he isn’t a right-wing loon, as he's not right-wing in the first place; nonetheless, Tate’s habits have made him susceptible to the media's strategy of rhetorical engineering. Conservatives’ issue with Tate isn't his ideology, as his advocacy for traditional masculinity and the undeniable existence of a higher power largely aligns with “Trad” philosophy. Despite Tate’s exclusive denial of engaging in Conservative thought, ruling elites’ attempts at making him into a right-wing loon, and Conservatives’ subsequent adoption of Tate as a right-wing revolutionary have led to the construction of a straw man of which Leftists are constantly at the ready to deploy.
One of the reasons why Leftist activists succeed in enraging countless dissenters is because they know precisely what to say in order to get those overemotional reactions. For example, recognizant of the fact that Conservatives pride themselves on supporting the advancement of every American, they know calling Tate racist, homophobic, sexist, etc. (of which he could be) hits a nerve so sensitive that despite being untrue, still has a magnitudinal impact on the way Conservatives who accept Andrew as one of their own, argue in the public sphere.
Where Andrew Tate’s demise begins is where he falls into the trap of succumbing to engineered media rhetoric. Like a contrarian teenager with the natural desire to rebel, Tate responds to Leftist scrutiny exactly the way his accusers want. Because the Overton Window has shifted so far Left, Andrew has become controlled by the dominant voices in the culture. As if Tate is their puppet, elitists craft rhetoric around how people like him will respond. These particular right-wing loons would feel weak and overpowered if they were to treat a woman correctly because of the image of Andrew Tate the mainstream media has crafted. This puts them in a position where they feel the need to make a “power play” and call women “F-ing idiots” as opposed to respectfully explaining why they’re wrong after claiming they need a man as much as a fish needs a bicycle.
This cause, symbolized by the phenomenon of “Andrew Tate Conservatism” has led to myriads of consequences, all calculated by the people who created the facade in the first place.
Chronically driven to dismantle the Conservative movement, in crafting the loony right-winger Tate, Leftists know it sows division among Conservatives, sending half of us to stand by him, and to accept the idea of a new member who is able to garner such attention, half of us to reject the idea of the whirling dervish of a man joining our side, and impelling all right wingers into a tizzy.
This strategic manipulation also validates any ad hominem incursion that progressives hurl at Tate. By becoming the reactionary, blind-with-rage person they want people to be, a rare case is created, where an attack on one's personality is an on-topic talking point persuasive to any listening ear. Any decent debater advises his listeners to refrain from getting emotional, as it shows the opponent that they hit a sore spot, while also intertwining one’s emotions with the argument, allowing whatever the opponent says concerning your character in return to become rather influential.
When discussing Andrew Tate, it seems most Conservative figures only consider him, failing to see the role the media play in the development of his persona. Tate denies his worldview as being Conservative, which is the way the right must keep it. By better defining what constitutes a Conservative, it remains harder for the media to conflate Andrew Tate’s demeanor with the likes of Conservatism itself.
Add comment
Comments